I'll try to update this post throughout the day, but for now I want to share some of the Uruguayan reaction to last night's match. The major Montevideo daily El País had the following headine: A Uruguay lo sacó el menos malo (The less bad team knocked Uruguay out). The match was too physical and lacking in skill for the writer's liking, but to me the main quote is the following:
Lo que más lastima no es haber quedado afuera, sino la paupérrima
imagen que dio este combinado juvenil dirigido por Gustavo Ferrín, que
para cerrar lo que fue un penoso paso por Canadá se coronó como mal
perdedor e intentó agredir a los estadounidenses mientras celebraban.
Futbolísticamente a nada jugó en los cuatro encuentros que disputó y
que, en definitiva, lo dejó afuera un equipo como el norteamericano que
ganó por ser el menos malo.
(What hurts more isn't being knocked out, but rather the poor image left by the youth squad directed by Gustavo Ferrín, that in closing what was a regrettable trip through Canada crowned themselves bad losers and tried to attack the Americans while they were celebrating. In football terms, nothing was at stake in the four matches that they played, and certainly, Uruguay were left out by a team such as the American squad that won by being the least bad.)
Doug McIntyre has a review of the match on ESPN Soccernet. It was the kind of ugly, physical performance that a contender has to win. He felt that Perk played very well, which is a very generous assessment to me. Bobby McMahon was at the game last night, and has a report on his blog. He singled out Nathan Sturgis as the best player on the field -- I felt Freddy Adu was more influential on the offensive front, but the defense needed to play well, and Sturgis was a major contributor. Colin Smith at the Off the Post blog shows that Uruguay's post-match antics are just part of a now traditional ritual.